1)
http://0-proquest.umi.com.maurice.bgsu.edu:80/pqdweb?did=1024397101&sid=7&Fmt=3&clientId=3340&RQT=309&VName=PQDDanish products are still being boycotted in various parts of the world. Aria, Europe's largest dairy company, has shut down its plant in the Saudi capital, Riyadh after a consumer boycott had affected sales throughout the Middle East and North Africa. The company's annual sales in the Middle East amount to some $430 million.
"The boycott of Danish products in the Middle East is now almost total," said a company spokesman. "All Arla's customers in the region have cancelled their orders and sales have come to a standstill in almost all markets."
In a statement Aria's group executive director, Peder Tuborgh said that while freedom of expression was an internal Danish issue, "this is about Denmark having offended millions of Muslims." Aria made a last-ditch attempt at quelling the boycott by paying leading Saudi newspapers to publish a statement released by the Danish government that said that Denmark "respects Islam as one of the world's major religions" and explained that the publication of the cartoons was the action of an independent newspaper, not affiliated to the government or any political party, over which the government had no influence.
2) I chose the article, “Cartoon Catastrophy”, because it talked about how the Muslims reacted to being disrespected by 12 caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad, which were created by a group of non-Muslims. These caricatures were created for Jyllands-Posten, a right of center newspaper based in Aarhus, Denmark. These caricatures were made for an author writing a book that wanted an illustrator to draw images of the Prophet but could not find someone to do it. According to the article, the images were published to provoke a debate with the Muslims living in Denmark (Scandinavian Press). This article shows how the Muslims of not only Denmark, but Muslims around the world reacted to these caricatures.
3) The article “Cartoon Catastrophy” relates to the video “Eyes on the Prize: Awakening 1954-1956”. These two relate because of the way both groups reacted to being disrespected by a majority group. In the video, the African Americans of the south found non-violent ways to protest and ways to gain respect in the eyes of the white Americans. The video mentioned how after Rosa Parks was arrested for not giving up her seat on the bus, and how the African Americans living in the southern cities boycotted the bus systems until the bus systems were desegregated. The desegregation of the busses occurred because enough people became involved to change the system. The article relates to the movie because in the article Muslims boycotted Danish products to earn an apology and respect. The article mentioned how Danish products were being boycotted by Muslims all around the world. This boycott occurred in response to the caricatures of their Prophet Muhammad. Instead of choosing a violent outburst against the illustrators, they chose a peaceful approach. They chose to boycott because they were offended by the illustrators and wanted respect from those people. They boycotted the Danish products until the newspaper that published the caricatures publically apologized. Their boycotts worked because it almost drove the company Aria, Europe’s largest dairy company. This company needed to shut down its plant in Saudi because of the boycott (Scandinavian Press). These boycotts affected the Denmark government who encouraged the newspaper to apologize, and the government also apologized to Muslims.
4) I believe that that it is good when people decide to protest in a non-violent way. When people choose to protest in a non-violent way, it shows that they are willing to find a resolution to a problem in a peaceful way. This shows that even when something bad occurs people still have the decency to act mature. This also shows how something peaceful can help to change society, or help a society see how it was wrong. After both of the boycotts the way societies changed their ways. The southern cities desegregated the city bus system, and the newspapers in Denmark made sure to be more careful with what they wrote about. These boycotts worked because people chose to ban together, whereas if only a few people decided to boycott things would not have worked out. I believe that it is good when people decide to ban together to work for a common goal that will benefit the society as a whole.